It is a reasonably held expectation that any GitHub repository contains source. This is an expectation that most Github contributors hold as well.
I would argue that by the laws of any software methodology, waterfall or agile, collecting feedback and lodging an issue counts as a labor that is assumed to come from an employee.
Ill save the philosophy but under any reasonable set of assumptions surely the contributors who perform this labor should be compensated. The two easiest ways to compensate this workforce seem to be a release of source or a salary.
hello steam,
It is a reasonably held expectation that any GitHub repository contains source. This is an expectation that most Github contributors hold as well.
I would argue that by the laws of any software methodology, waterfall or agile, collecting feedback and lodging an issue counts as a labor that is assumed to come from an employee.
Ill save the philosophy but under any reasonable set of assumptions surely the contributors who perform this labor should be compensated. The two easiest ways to compensate this workforce seem to be a release of source or a salary.
I dunno im interested in hearing what is easier.